http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/06/sequencing-the-left-hand/ classical guitar lessons, tips, tricks and interviews Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:22:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/06/sequencing-the-left-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-821 Jon Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:58:55 +0000 http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1493#comment-821 Sorry Chris my bad I knew it was in E minor too, how embarrasing. Yeah my suggestion is absolutely pointless when you take into account the F#! Sorry Chris my bad I knew it was in E minor too, how embarrasing. Yeah my suggestion is absolutely pointless when you take into account the F#!

]]> http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/06/sequencing-the-left-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-820 Chris Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:50:34 +0000 http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1493#comment-820 Doesn't go against the point of the study, I just do it that way because it's easier for me. It's also an F#, which would mean the wrist would change angles making using 3 and 4 as guide fingers more difficult. Doesn’t go against the point of the study, I just do it that way because it’s easier for me. It’s also an F#, which would mean the wrist would change angles making using 3 and 4 as guide fingers more difficult.

]]> http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/06/sequencing-the-left-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-819 Jon Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:10:53 +0000 http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1493#comment-819 Why not use your 3rd and 4th finger for the E Minor so they are ready to slide up into postition for the FMaj7 inversion? Or does that go against the point of the Study? Why not use your 3rd and 4th finger for the E Minor so they are ready to slide up into postition for the FMaj7 inversion? Or does that go against the point of the Study?

]]>