<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To a Mother Concerned About File Sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/04/to-a-mother-concerned-about-file-sharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/04/to-a-mother-concerned-about-file-sharing/</link>
	<description>classical guitar lessons, tips, tricks and interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/04/to-a-mother-concerned-about-file-sharing/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1050#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>I vote in favour of maintaining scope for trade, because we only know to live by trade. In support of this, I state that by eating, we trade with nature for time. To stop eating is to abandon our link with time, i.e., to die.

This means that we have to operate a system of property as produce (or equivalent), including digital produce, so that more people have a chance to engage in trade, which generates taxes, which pays welfare.  To pursue the point, if you don&#039;t think there is any need for trade in digital produce, why does your blog carry adverts for produce and which are also intended to pay you commission?

I ask the question because it seems that you are happy with the idea of free music. So am I, but it&#039;s the perogative of content providers - the musicans - to decide what can be free for marketing purposes and what must be paid for, so they have a chance to generate a return for their efforts.  In my own case, if my YouTube viewcount ever reaches the point where I can become a partner and thus carry adverts then I&#039;ll certainly carry them.  I&#039;d  be crazy not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote in favour of maintaining scope for trade, because we only know to live by trade. In support of this, I state that by eating, we trade with nature for time. To stop eating is to abandon our link with time, i.e., to die.</p>
<p>This means that we have to operate a system of property as produce (or equivalent), including digital produce, so that more people have a chance to engage in trade, which generates taxes, which pays welfare.  To pursue the point, if you don&#8217;t think there is any need for trade in digital produce, why does your blog carry adverts for produce and which are also intended to pay you commission?</p>
<p>I ask the question because it seems that you are happy with the idea of free music. So am I, but it&#8217;s the perogative of content providers &#8211; the musicans &#8211; to decide what can be free for marketing purposes and what must be paid for, so they have a chance to generate a return for their efforts.  In my own case, if my YouTube viewcount ever reaches the point where I can become a partner and thus carry adverts then I&#8217;ll certainly carry them.  I&#8217;d  be crazy not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/04/to-a-mother-concerned-about-file-sharing/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1050#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris - great response.  I think you have great points, and I feel the same way about it. My response was similar in some ways - I think we may have a lot in common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris &#8211; great response.  I think you have great points, and I feel the same way about it. My response was similar in some ways &#8211; I think we may have a lot in common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobber</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/2009/04/to-a-mother-concerned-about-file-sharing/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=1050#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Very good thoughts here.  I encourage you to read this book written by two economics professors at Washington University.  You can download the whole book for free:
http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm

And another good short essay on copyright worth reading is this one by conservative Christian Theologian Vern Poythress:
http://www.frame-poythress.org/poythress_articles/2005Copyrights.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good thoughts here.  I encourage you to read this book written by two economics professors at Washington University.  You can download the whole book for free:<br />
<a href="http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm</a></p>
<p>And another good short essay on copyright worth reading is this one by conservative Christian Theologian Vern Poythress:<br />
<a href="http://www.frame-poythress.org/poythress_articles/2005Copyrights.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.frame-poythress.org/poythress_articles/2005Copyrights.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
